What these platforms watch for
According to Karat's published guidance for engineering leaders, the strongest signals of AI-assisted answers in technical interviews are: continuous screen switching, instant fully-formed solutions, inconsistent verbal explanations of pasted code, and the bare presence of paste events themselves.
Hirevue's own cheating analysis echoes the same list and adds a fifth: typing cadence that doesn't match a candidate's other writing samples — too uniform, too fast, no corrections.
Why pasting is the loudest signal
Browser paste events are unmissable to any JavaScript that wants to listen. Most assessment platforms log them with a timestamp, a target field, and the size of the pasted content. A 2,000-character paste into a "describe a difficult conflict" answer field is a smoking gun.
How Wraitor changes what the platform sees
- No paste event. Wraitor never touches the clipboard API of the browser. Its keystrokes come from the OS input stack.
- Realistic WPM with variance. Per-character delays follow a Gaussian distribution centred on your chosen pace.
- Bursts and pauses. Mid-word characters type faster than word-initial ones. Sentence-ending punctuation triggers longer pauses, just like real cognition.
- Self-corrections. Occasional QWERTY-neighbour typos with backspace-and-retype — the most human signature of all.
- Fatigue drift. On long answers, wraitor's WPM gradually drops and typo rate climbs, mirroring real fatigue.
The one signal Wraitor can't fix
Use it responsibly
Wraitor delivers text you wrote elsewhere. It does not write your answer for you. We don't endorse misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own original work in interviews where that misrepresentation is explicitly prohibited. See terms.